Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 07:52

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Copilot Vision brings Microsoft's screen-watching AI to everyday Windows tasks - TechSpot
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Miley Cyrus Reveals What Caused Her Estrangement from Dad Billy Ray for the First Time - instyle.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Where's Marty McFly's guitar? Search is on for 'Back to the Future' prop 4 decades later - NBC News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Did you swallow cum the first time you sucked a penis?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
How does Kamala Harris plan to tackle the housing crisis?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump administration prepares to ease big bank rules - Politico